"...sea of Thought alone" wrote Wordsworth in a poem about Isaac Newton. Now it may become possible to peer into the thought of people who think deeply about most things, thought included. This would further revolutionise the progress people make in advancing the productivity leverage in STEM domains and software engineering. The 100X productivity is appearing now, will it be possible to go to 1000X within the next 10 years? ...and replicate that as part of a system of thinking from person to person. Could it be something that is learned and assumed by students?
There is certainly an element of breaking out of the pragmatics of a System in highly effective and transformative thinking just like in zen tuition.
Openwater is the brainchild of a former Facebook executive Mary Lou : they plan to create a wearable to enable us to see the inner workings of the body and brain at high resolution. And do that at 1000 dollars I would guess. It would fit into a hat or a headband.
You could type at the speed of thought! Or even just think up structures of code in mere seconds. It will likely go much further as it could be combined with Machine Learning, which itself will have moved by leaps and bounds in 8 years time. It will be noninvasive. It will have much potential in improving our cognitive capabilities at the speed of thought itself!
Thursday, 14 September 2017
Friday, 8 September 2017
Unwilling Masochism
... a state in which one is harmed, rejected or "trained" without actually asking for it. The result must be distinct and separated from the actual deeds and behaviours. another one of those philosophical laxatives with a sleeping pill and an unpleasant epiphany in the morning.
My Personal Cassandra Effects
- More rains as part of the global warming and changing weather patterns, less actual sunshine
- WTC would be attacked. Some of the original bombers told that it would be attacked in 10 years time.
- There maybe duons in the DNA among the codons
- Blockchain will fundamentally alter the principles of regulation of economy by state actors in their present forms. The separation of state from economy happens.
- China would converge in their military and economic interests with the Islamic world, Pakistan, maybe Iran
- Computers will be guiding the development of better programs in machine learning around 2015 - it happened in 2017
- Computers will have the same complexity as a human brain in the 30s not the 20s as Kurzweil predicted.
- Consciousness is not likely to emerge for another 10 years to the general public, so maybe in the early 40s. Comatose 'brains' and mentally ill cyberbrains may be the first iterations...!
- Moore's Law will go (almost) unbroken until the new paradigm of nanoengineered carbon computers take over, likely working on optronic systems instead of electronics
The Energetic Limit of a Bot Swarm in Sandboxes
Sandboxes are software fences for programs that could harm the System. By itself a malevolent or error prone code could stall, or crash the system. Inside a sandbox the sandbox would be closed instead, and the system would persist.
So one could create an ethical principle that if you use artilects or bots to improve your life in some way, they could not interact with other bots to harm other people as a result of their activities. Success should not be based on malicious intents against others.
However in this way one is limited in their growth only by the number and functionalities of the bots which in turn are limited by the computing power that could be brought to bear which in turn ultimately needs energy.
It might be an interesting mathematical limit to explore for an information economist - does the energy requirement increase at a faster rate than the growth rate of computing power, the Moore's Law?
- does the increase for energy reduce with time?
- do effective algorithms prove to give an advantage for bots to reduce the need for ever more computing power?
And what would the trends confluence on, if at all...
So one could create an ethical principle that if you use artilects or bots to improve your life in some way, they could not interact with other bots to harm other people as a result of their activities. Success should not be based on malicious intents against others.
However in this way one is limited in their growth only by the number and functionalities of the bots which in turn are limited by the computing power that could be brought to bear which in turn ultimately needs energy.
It might be an interesting mathematical limit to explore for an information economist - does the energy requirement increase at a faster rate than the growth rate of computing power, the Moore's Law?
- does the increase for energy reduce with time?
- do effective algorithms prove to give an advantage for bots to reduce the need for ever more computing power?
And what would the trends confluence on, if at all...
Labels:
ai ethics,
artilects,
computing,
programming
An Optimistic Fatalist
An interesting combination: like a laxative with a sleeping pill!
An optimist believes in a positive and successful and progressive future, while fatalist thinks that there is no way to alter the present to change the future.
I suppose that some reading of communism would present exactly that kind of a view on reality. Emancipation and the revolution are imminent but there is nothing that one could do now because of historical materialism is formed by the masses.
It also provides an angst of existence, by letting you know that there is something better, but even if you want to be part of it your effort avails you a Nothing - no difference.
An optimist believes in a positive and successful and progressive future, while fatalist thinks that there is no way to alter the present to change the future.
I suppose that some reading of communism would present exactly that kind of a view on reality. Emancipation and the revolution are imminent but there is nothing that one could do now because of historical materialism is formed by the masses.
It also provides an angst of existence, by letting you know that there is something better, but even if you want to be part of it your effort avails you a Nothing - no difference.
Wednesday, 6 September 2017
The Fourth Escape from Nihilism
To play a game and regard the existence in terms of rules you can apply to it.
Absence as a Source
Absence of judgement is LOVE
Absence of pain is HAPPINESS
Absence of evaluation is PEACE
Absence of distraction is SERENITY
Absence of feelings is SOBRIETY
Absence of completion is OPENNESS
Absence of secrecy is TRANSPARENCY
Absence of perfection is DIVERSITY
Absence of contaminant is PURITY
Absence of pomposity is BREVITY
Absolute absence is the UNKNOWN NOTHING a source of the unnumbered, an empty unit, that can always be added to itself without growth or compoundment. No whole results from this either. No divisibility into parts of differing qualities.
'is' refers to a assignment or signifies the source of the succeeding object.
Absence of pain is HAPPINESS
Absence of evaluation is PEACE
Absence of distraction is SERENITY
Absence of feelings is SOBRIETY
Absence of completion is OPENNESS
Absence of secrecy is TRANSPARENCY
Absence of perfection is DIVERSITY
Absence of contaminant is PURITY
Absence of pomposity is BREVITY
Absolute absence is the UNKNOWN NOTHING a source of the unnumbered, an empty unit, that can always be added to itself without growth or compoundment. No whole results from this either. No divisibility into parts of differing qualities.
'is' refers to a assignment or signifies the source of the succeeding object.
On Justice
Hegel writes on the right of the society to bestow the right to a sentence when a criminal is judged. The criminal has a right to a sentence.
There are two options to where that right becomes unnecessary, first, if the person is rehabilitated fully before the sentence and the behaviour has altered radically, there is a complete shift in the identity, secondly if a pardon has been signed and the truth of the conviction behind the sentence has been overturned.
In the first case we can experiment with the possibility only now with the changes availed by information technologies and advances in psychological and emotological evaluations. We should be aware however that the psychopathic mind will always seek to game the experiments and alter outcomes.
In the second case we have to seek rehabilitation for the society itself.
There are two options to where that right becomes unnecessary, first, if the person is rehabilitated fully before the sentence and the behaviour has altered radically, there is a complete shift in the identity, secondly if a pardon has been signed and the truth of the conviction behind the sentence has been overturned.
In the first case we can experiment with the possibility only now with the changes availed by information technologies and advances in psychological and emotological evaluations. We should be aware however that the psychopathic mind will always seek to game the experiments and alter outcomes.
In the second case we have to seek rehabilitation for the society itself.
Impact Theory, Upgraded
About a year ago I started watching and bingeing on self help and development through interviews with millionaires and influencers by the very successful Tom Bilyeu who started the Inside Quest and pivoted for the second time the whole thing into the Impact Theory a while ago.
So I read the Impact Theory Belief System, comprising of 25 points. As I was reading I realised that they could be improved on a lot. Many of the phrases contain ambiguous or negative terms that cannot be measured or even defined easily. So it may be necessary to put in more detail and upgrade the belief system for it to work as something more than a vague guide for inspiration and a drive for the grind.
So here is my version 2.0beta with all the kudos for the great original:
So I read the Impact Theory Belief System, comprising of 25 points. As I was reading I realised that they could be improved on a lot. Many of the phrases contain ambiguous or negative terms that cannot be measured or even defined easily. So it may be necessary to put in more detail and upgrade the belief system for it to work as something more than a vague guide for inspiration and a drive for the grind.
So here is my version 2.0beta with all the kudos for the great original:
- Original: Human potential is nearly limitless.
How nearly, and how limitless?
Upgrade: Human potential can be set new, more advanced targets on every iteration. You define your iterations and targets and reviews. - Original: Personal growth is the highest priority of Impactivists
Do people actually walk the talk, behave according to their priorities?
Upgrade: Impactivists are made when they set personal growth as the first priority and take massive action to pursue it. - Original: You can acquire new skills in any area at any time.
How does this connect with the personal growth? Could this potential be ignored? What limits are there to the skill areas?
Upgrade: To make progress in personal growth you acquire new skills in the areas in need and among your interests by working on them in a constant flow-based drive between boredom and frustration. - Original: It requires focus and disciplined practice to acquire new skills
How about insights that come in a flash with little prior warning and propel your understanding of the skill to a whole new level? Training routines can only be a start for the flow, one needs to escape the routine to see the skill from the outside looking in, to have insights. Focus is a killer of insights.
Upgrade: One needs meditation and practice and self-conscious retrospectives to acquire new skills - Original: You can do anything you set your mind to, without limitation.
If there is one lie then why not have more, other points are connected to this one after all. Again the limitation problem...
Upgrade: You can do anything in your mind dojo, transcend your previous limits regularly.
Mind Dojo is a training room for your mind, perhaps it also includes a Mind Castle, an imaginary visual streaming 'greenroom' and other tools... - Original: #5 is a lie. But it is an empowering lie. Impactivists do and believe that which empowers us.
Why lie?
Upgrade: Number 5 is an illusion that empowers Impactivists. Impactivists do and believe that which empowers us and they weed out everything that disempowers. - Original: It does not matter who you are today. It only matters who you want to become and how hard you are willing to work to become that person.
First point is negative.
Upgrade: Define the target self of your personal growth and set how hard you work to get into that skin. - Original: See beyond your current self to the opportunity of becoming the best version of yourself.
Overlaps too much with the previous point now, however:
Upgrade: Visualize the best future you that you imagine now. - Original: The Impact Theory Community is a safe place to make mistakes.
- Original: Mistakes are a great teacher to those who are willing to admit they have made one.
Can be shortened to:
Upgrade: Admit your mistakes and learn from them. - Original: Share the lessons learned from your mistakes with your fellow Impactivists.
- Original: Failure is temporary. Move quickly beyond it.
May I rest on the laurels?
Upgrade:Success is temporary. Move quickly beyond it. - Original: Everyone has something to teach you. Learn from whoever you can.
Upgrade: Everyone has something to teach you. Learn from everyone you have time for. - Original: Impactivsts do not make excuses. Ever.
Impactivists fulfill or decline an opportunity without justification. - Original: Any obstacle can be overcome
Negative
Upgrade: Any opportunity can be resolved. - Original: Building your self-esteem around being right all the time will lead to poor decision making.
Are there other ways of building your self esteem?
Upgrade: Build your self-esteem properly. Improve decision-making by admitting when you are mistaken. - Original: Building your self-esteem around identifying the right answer and pursuing it faster than anyone else.
So fast that you burn out before you get there? Who needs to identify the right answer and does that include robbing the glory surrounding the right answer from someone else?
Upgrade: Build your self-esteem properly. Identify the right answer and accept it, respecting the person who originated it. Pursue the path speedily, effectively and consistently. - Original: Have very clear goals
Upgrade: Have SMART goals, a vision with WHY and a mission for the world. - Original: Do that which moves you toward your goals.
Upgrade: Emotivate yourself you towards your goals. - Original: Do not do what moves you away from your goals
Upgrade: Remove and obviate distractions persistently. - Original: Only work in an environment that is moving you towards goals
Upgrade: Change the environment that moves you towards your goals faster. - Original: Impactivists are linchpins who work hard, smart and long hours
Upgrade: Use as many hours as you can possibly sustain, working hard and smartening your work. - Original: Passion will help you keep fighting to reach your goals when things get difficult. Center your life on passion.
Upgrade: Center your life on passion to overcome passion. - Original: Impactivists motivate and inspire those around them.
Upgrade: Motivate, inspire and uplift those around you. - Original: Take the RED pill
Upgrade: Take the RED pill
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
