The Absurd: Inquisitive and Imperative escape routes

When learning about forms of statement I noticed there being two different forms of judgment statements that are not absurd and then the absurd form of judgment statements. I draw a parallel and show that the existentialism of Camus is itself now at the border of meaning, carrying on to the possibility that there is meaning therefore in science(the inquisitive statements) and both ethical(imperative -how to follow rules(of life)) and political (imperative - how to make rules for living) spheres. Recall Descartes pondering on a similar theme. Therefore there is a meaning of life since all off these tracks may be meaningless by being absurd. Meaning cannot be reduced to absurdity, that once it is there it continues as part of human knowledge and be a fruit of the mind to be consumed by countless sets of generations to come.