Monday, 17 May 2010

Smaller steps in changes - higher level of randomness

About ten years ago I looked at population functions
like xn+1=r*c*xn - r*c*xn*xn
i found that the smaller the changes the more likely the functions were to reach turbulance.
Recently trading figures show an exponential drop in the time taken for making a trade, so I have an explanation for the turmoil on the markets on the first decade.
It also explains its small cousin - FTSE going digital at the end of the eighties.
LSE goes over to Linux this year!

No comments: