yeah ok i love you
no this one i love the one who smiles at me like a sunshine and i know that this is so old-fashionable to say that that no modern people of my time would express it this way
however love is an archetype it flows even when meaning changes in human history.
if this is worth one look even though it is as simple as it could be
then there must be worth in things more complicated to compare them, or to be wise enoguh to know their place without resorting to comparison thus elevating both. Clearly love blinds and i noticed the swathes of mistakes only later
this is something that works as a preamble.
a few years ago in 2004 a met a young poetess who is remarkable and writes under a pseudonym, when i spoke to her of my ideas about love and that philosophers have not esteemed it as the most often occurring of themes, she told me to write it all down. I know only of Hannah Arendt who has written on love.
Well there are others and recently there has been Zizek the Lacanian Marxist.
Zizek tells how love allows us to perceive absolute beauty through our partner as an object of love.
There is also a Derrida interview and he avoids it for half of it until speaking.
Michael Hardt has a lecture on love.
philosophia is a special object of love and therefore it does not lend itself to an inquiry of the somatic nature of man too easily and on another note there is the mystery of love, that forms essence without anything, even thoughts or cognition, and wipes discrimination. In this it continues development of man and is so close to another such semios -- God.
I will do it. And there is a lot. The original essay may be lost. Love lives forever.
Some people to read on this topic are
Erich Fromm Art of Loving
Luce Irigaray The way of Love
Plato The Symposium
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment