Sunday, 7 October 2007

Value after abundance

As we will one day show customers to our products i think it might be a good idea to take a look at the value and the way it is defined

there are five actors who determine some factor of the price


  • owners/investors
  • producers/delivery
  • marketers
  • users
  • peers (competitors/colluders/subsidiaries/partners)

this means that the function is a nonlinear function that would be very unlikely to provide constant values.

these actors would define a series of values which affect the price

  1. the number of units produced by peers in the same market sector
  2. the number of units sold by peers
  3. the number of users
  4. the number of leads made by marketers
  5. the number of users gained from peers by marketers
  6. the amount spent on materials (and machines)
  7. the amount spent on delivery
  8. the amount spent on producers
  9. the amount spent on marketing
  10. the amount spent on investors
PS I plan to write up a formula and investigate the phase spaces to see what happens if the amount spent on producers goes towards nill.

Part 2

as robots are used in production driving the costs to very low, the prices of the produce are determined with reference to prices determined by previous methods of production, to show high increase of revenue for investors.
Whereas the use value that the users could harness from the product are very high in comparison to production costs if they are robots produced by robots. To pass that on to the customer would alter the system of the market completely.

Part 3


As a human societies develop robotics for handling production and care we would be freed to develop our art and play games, enjoy in life.
It would be freedom on one hand and serious work on avoiding it as rejection.
Because as peoples work loses significance they might be expelled rather than liberated. So existence needs to be defined again. And it should be a joyous experience.
I am struggling here but the attempt was to bring in the producer or the market as the funder of pensions in line with production increase/production cost decrease

No comments: